BigAssFan

Hesa joba isa to talka.

‘The planet’ was just short for ‘all organisms living on the planet’. The planet itself is not living, so it cannot be killed. But you knew that all along, did you not?

Technology was always built on energy sources. Hopefully nuclear fission will perform as anticipated, as current sustainable energy sources will run out sooner or later. I’m not sure how wind turbines and solar power will survive in a lower energy avalibility society. Looks like a Mad Max scenario to me.

The question was about evolution, how is this not part of that discussion? When we’ve destroyed all natural resources and heated up the atmosphere beyond food production possibilities (including loss of biodiversity), we’re back at the stone age. With matching population numbers. Evolution will take it from there.

You could also have too much offspring. Our current reproduction rates already have us at the brink of collapse. And the rest if the planet with us.

So land-based creatures are worth saving, but oceans are not? Fascinating.

You can eveporate your way out of it, given enough time.

Your poor mother with broken arms most certainly should’nt be involved.

People choose those politicians, too sensitive for fear of even slightly bigger government. Paired with racism, nowadays.

A doctor sees a lot of patients each day, so she can have a pretty clear picture about the mental health in the population. This statement isn’t necessarily about the doctor herself.

By then you only get 1 dollar.

deleted by creator

Who else should tell them? Sure, it could probably have been phrased better, but the message stays the same. And I believe in the power of repetition. There’s still a very long way to go, worldwide. I’m well aware of that. But every journey is one step at a time.

Well, I was just responding to the original question. I thought that was the purpose of Lemmy, in a nutshell, to provide some different points of view. Seems like some people can’t deal with that.

Tool in the hands of the animals you mean? Or being responsible for next generations? Only a fool would think that reasoning falls down when you address both issues. Thinking one step further than what’s on your plate would be quite beneficial, for everyone.

Yeah, I remember. But how important is that?

Hmm, no logic in those 2 sentences. No arguments either. Wonder why that is.

This dependence on meat is mostly imaginary.

Mine has been upgraded to an oil thermometer, as meat consumption is not only highly immoral, but also self-destructive in the long run.

Reverse the metaphor.