Got it, let me know when your head is out of your ass.

Imagine thinking this is a gotcha.

‘Hehe, this guy admitted he was wrong about something - fucking owned.’

You’re a child, go sit in the corner.

Holy, you need to stop responding to my messages.

Hold on, what?

If a beard hair getting in your mouth isn’t a strong enough reason for you to shave your beard, then it’s not a deal breaker/ you don’t hate it.

This is a ridiculous statement. Disliking an aspect of something and putting up with it for other reasons is such a natural thing it makes me wonder if you’ve ever styled yourself in any other capacity than troglodyte.

For example my girlfriend likes my beard. So I keep it. Because she likes it. You see how that works, cave person?

Yeah that context is important, the title is enough to make me write the whole thing off.

I understand why clickbait strategies are common, I am just not the common denominator that they’re aimed at. Am I judging a book by its cover? Yes… but I’d also judge ‘Notes on How to Skin a Baby’ by its cover so… idk.

Edit: that wasn’t fair of me. Let me rethink this response.

Edit2: I recognize the paradox here, I think I was using deceit incorrectly. I accept your responses, thanks for being cordial.

When did I say that?

I hate pubes because I don’t like hair near my mouth in general. I don’t ask my girlfriend to shave, she does it because she sees my own reaction when a beard hair gets in my mouth.

Like I said, blanket generalizations are inherently deceitful.

Edit: I used deceitful incorrectly. There is no intent to deceive. It may be deceitful, it may be unintentionally misleading. There is nuance here.

I don’t care what you think your qualifications are. These three things are true: I love my girlfriend, I am sexually attracted to my girlfriend, I hate pubes. Whatever you think is irrelevant.

You don’t need to intend to be deceitful to be deceitful, just like you don’t need to intend to kill someone to kill them.

The world is not sweeping absolutes. Painting it as such always obscures some truth, this post is no different.

Edit: I’m just wrong here, I was misusing deceitful.

I’m not sure that I have, actually — blanket generalizations are inherently deceitful.

I think anyone that makes blanket generalizations is deceitful, what a coincidence.

I was waiting for the pseudoscience bullshit to start pouring into this post.

Ah, I didn’t realize those were the circumstances — I assumed it was from wherever he was working at the time (I thought it was Hawaii but I could be wrong).

Look, either:

1. You are a low effort troll

Or

2. You need to recognize that this is a legitimate phenomenon based on observable interactions online.

Pick one.

Wow it took me much longer than I thought it would to find a loss comment.

I thought I was going to be the only one who noticed lol.

That seems odd to me.

He was working in Hawaii so he takes a layover in Russia??

Something doesn’t smell right, even with how weird layovers can be.

Low effort troll

the whole story around that is scary as fuck.

I think you need to define scary here, the story is an example of good parenting from the mother.

autistic

TV autistic, where autism is a super power

BLT. I always hated tomatoes, then I started growing them with my mom. Grew some called ‘Bread and Salt’ tomatoes. Holy fuck, my brain expanded — best sandwich I’ve had in recent memory.