Yeah I don’t get it. You can also work for established companies where you get steady income instead of volatile stocks but you’re not going to be able to retire super early with a work life balance that way
- 0 Posts
- 62 Comments
might
Yeah it’s risky. People do it multiple times though and one success pays out. It’s a risky choice that I wouldn’t make but I understand why people do
That’s startup life. Dude might be rolling in it in a couple years and it’s a decision. Feel bad for the non tech workers around the bay
Draces@lemmy.worldto
Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•When rich people can edit their kids DNA won't that just lock everyone else out and create a new class?
8·2 months agoYep, they’ll act like they care, think that they care, but put the mildest of obstacles in front of them and they’ll throw a poor person into a meat grinder to avoid it. People who grew up with money have no character or idea how to weather any kind of hardship
You understand that doesn’t contradict my point in any way right?
Maybe, but they’re not helping Republicans as much as people like you
The comic is only accurate if you expect it do everything for you, you’re bad at communicating, and you’re using an old model. Or if you’re just unlucky
She’s locking the door. There’s more implication than failing to sell sex to women there
Where does it say that only single men commit rape
You mean the punchline?
Don’t link to x. Take a screenshot and post it please
And your car or flight is a massive strain on the environment. I think you’re missing the point. There’s a way to use tools responsibly. We’ve taken the chains off and that’s obviously a problem but the AI hate here is irrational
They factually are. ML is AI. I think you mean AGI maybe?
Uh dismissing that concern seems like valid point? Do people have to comprehensively discredit the whole list to reply?
I’m saying it because I’ve seen them make the same argument, as I have done myself, in different ways.
I’m saying it because I’ve seen them make the same argument, as I have done myself, in different ways.
Then maybe you didn’t read the conversation
My point is that being “anti-authoritarian” is meaningless unless
That seems to be your new point and again I don’t care to argue what a “true about authoritarian” is. If you think me wanting the ss to have been executed after the Holocaust disqualifies me as anti authoritarian you’re welcome to think that, I don’t respect your opinion in that case. That was the conversation where you entered.
Their argument is that I’m not anti authoritarian. Afaict you’re not making that argument. I’m not interested in fighting about what is or isn’t a true Scotsman. This devolves quickly into if you believe in the government having any power, that’s an endorsement of authoritarianism and now no one can be anti authoritarian if they believe in any kind of enforceable law.
No I’m pretty sure they pulled something from another post to try to misrepresent it because they’re a bitter terminally online loser. That is a very generous interpretation though



Lmao yes, telling you to feel bad for non tech workers in the bay area makes me libertarian