

Minor Internet Influencer uses minor internet influence to raise funds for campaign.
No mention of her parents was made in the article linked.
Minor Internet Influencer uses minor internet influence to raise funds for campaign.
No mention of her parents was made in the article linked.
Three days tops.
When was GN proven wrong and did they at least admit they where wrong? Everybody gets things wrong, it’s how often you’re wrong and how you handle being wrong that matters.
Not being held legally liable ≠ Nothing happened
Afaik the report that was done was not made public. If one side paid for the investigation and controls all the info in said investigation then it can’t be used as proof of innocence.
The firm also has its own reputation to consider, and wouldn’t let a client get away with materially misrepresenting their results.
Meaning what? What would the company doing the investigation do is if the claims that someone said:
I was asked about my sexual history, my boyfriends sexual history, “how I liked to fuck”.
I was asked to twerk for a co-worker at one point.
I was told I was chunky, fat, ugly, stupid. I was called “retarded” I was called a "removed
Where true? How would one even prove that actually happened to them? The Investigation Company surely signed an NDA and had no legal ability to release any info found in says investigation right? If they started releasing info that accusations where in fact true they would lose all their business immediately right?
https://lemmy.zip/comment/13100245
Here’s a quick roundup of some, but not all of the issues people have with LTT.
A former LTT employee made claims of sexual harassment and poor working environment. LTT paid a third party to investigate those claims and unsurprisingly didn’t find evidence that supported those claims. A lot of LTT stans use this as “evidence” that the accuser was lying. Assuming that is clearly false logic, investigating yourself isn’t proof of innocence.
I think you should go and sarcastically call his wife a DEI hire/wife the whole time lol
Isn’t that the point though? Why would anyone rather be the CEO of a company over just retiring and surfing or traveling or writing poetry etc… Being a CEO is a type of mental illness at some point.
Cops also have to deal with insurance companies 🤷🏻
I’ve never seen pex running into a house from the street/ground. It’s always been copper up to the water meter at the very least and it’s code (in NJ at least) to put grounding wire there.
deleted by creator
If you live by a Micro Center, their house brand is pretty good.
They’re going on trails that other people walk on anyways. What’s the difference between these treads and the hundreds of shoes that walk those trails?
I didn’t read the whole thread before linking that video, so a few things to consider.
I think people here are taking OPs question a little bit to seriously and Kevin Smith is 100% a valid answer. The question was about someone you “liked” and don’t “like” now. Not, who turned out to be a horrible person.
Kevin Smith hasn’t done anything controversial and genuinely seems like a nice man enjoying life and good for him. But, artisticly his movies have fallen off considerably in my opinion and lack any effort/message. Personality wise he’s also made a major shift. Previously being more thoughtful and critical of things to now kind of just gone full “happy stoner shill”.
As someone who grew up in 90s New Jersey Kevin Smiths and his early work will always hold a special place in my heart but I’ll probably never watch anything new he’ll ever make the rest of my life.
Patrick (H) Willems actually did a great video essay on basically this exact subject that’s worth a watch lol