Trailblazing Braille Taser

… was he ok?

This is Deadpool wearing a Spider Man costume

Take a look at all the struct definition. It’s a pure virtual method of 🍴 with a bunch of overrides in the structs that inherit from 🍴.

Dats a goose

Ok boomer

That’s neat, I’d never heard of it before!

It is an open question whether an Angel of some power k can escape forever.

Looks like you’re quoting the Proceedings of 11th Annual International Conference on Computing and Combinatorics from 2005: https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.5555/2958119.2958180

Apparently, it was solved (twice!) the next year.

In late 2006, the original problem was solved when independent proofs appeared, showing that an angel can win. Bowditch proved that a 4-angel (that is, an angel with power k = 4) can win[2] and Máthé[3] and Kloster[4] gave proofs that a 2-angel can win.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angel_problem

Yeah, there really should be some expectation of stewardship in exchange for absurd post-Disney copyright durations.

Actually I would like to read that. Might be worth the risk?

You’re coming dangerously close to setting Rufus free. I have a feeling you’re about to be visited by a time traveler with a dire warning if you keep trying this.

Well I know that I’m late for school, but I can’t go back after everyone saw me in my underwear. Wait, I’m a 40 year old man…

What does “maintain a lower profile” mean specifically? I think the point of a private tracker is that you don’t need to enable DHT, which effectively broadcasts to the internet that your IP address is trying to download content identified by a specific hash.

Isn’t that the whole point of a private tracker?

Would you rather buy 15 pills for $15 or 500 pills for the same price? That’s why we buy the mega bottles.

The code is speaking to me, but it’s just word salad.

Not to pile on here, but this is not an instance of the birthday problem.

The birthday problem would kick in if we asked “what are the chances that any two of these N people know the same place, whatever it may be.”

But instead we’re discussing “what are the chances that one of these N people recognizes a specific place P.”

Edit: maybe I’ve missed your point actually — were you saying that there are many details in one image, and the chances of some player recognizing one of those details is an instance of the birthday problem?

The classical options are that the world will end in the future, is currently ending, or ended in the past. Today, I’m here to tell you that there is another option: the world never even existed. Poof!

No, I don’t think I will

Urethrarts are dangerous, consult a doctor

Am I being dense? I don’t get it.

what is my purpose?