cm0002@piefed.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 year agoWebplemmy.mlimagemessage-square230linkfedilinkarrow-up1782arrow-down10 cross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1782arrow-down1imageWebplemmy.mlcm0002@piefed.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square230linkfedilink cross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
minus-squarepalordrolap@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up23·1 year agoSo does JPEG. It doesn’t mean that people (will) use it for that.
minus-squareMower2560@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoActually? I didnt know that. Is it used often? Any downsides ?
minus-squarefilcuk@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 year agoPractically never because it’s rubbish. The only possible use is on old precision machines that don’t support newer standards, like medical imaging.
Quality loss? Webp supports lossless.
So does JPEG. It doesn’t mean that people (will) use it for that.
Actually? I didnt know that. Is it used often? Any downsides ?
Practically never because it’s rubbish. The only possible use is on old precision machines that don’t support newer standards, like medical imaging.