• AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Not that I have a particular problem with desire paths, but what’s shown in the comic here is an example of how the design changed to take into account how people are interacting with it, and yet it didn’t work out.

    • sqw@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      right, it was changed specifically to deny the most popular use. so thats why it doesnt work.

    • Fifrok@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      It didn’t work out because the design didn’t change, it was reinforced. Each attempt failed because there was no actual effort to understand why it’s not working. Like wraping a leaky rusted pipe in ducktape.

        • Fifrok@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yes? The new path is there because it’s still shorter, people don’t walk in straight lines and sharp angles. That design is still lazy and not thought out

          • TheFogan@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            I mean what is a “thought out” path, besides just saying fuck it and paving whole plot. I mean maybe a funnel or something, but again kind of seems likely that we’d wind up with more desire paths forming just differently, maybe people coming from different starting points etc…

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      The only time where the design actually changed, the designer made the point of moving the path away from whhere the desire path was pointing.

      That comic captures it so incredibly well. It’s almost perfect.

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Yeah, that person you replied to missed the point entirely, and all the people who up-voted them.

        • Victor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          For me, it was heavy on the “you can’t please everyone” aspect. You try and try, first at enforcing the solution you thought was best, but people have their own problems and their own agenda. Then you try to accommodate that. But you’ll find that there’s always someone whom you can’t please.

          That was my personal take-away.