. The race of a voice actor doesn’t matter

. It is possible to wear yoga pants because there comfy

. You don’t need to shower everyday

. It is possible to crossdress/be gender non-conforming without being trans

. Monty Python is very overrated

  • chunes@lemmy.world
    45·
    2 days ago
    • No one should be allowed to own a second home until everyone has one.
    • Static typing sucks.
    • rabber@lemmy.caEnglish
      10·
      2 days ago

      Rather than banning that just tax the shit out of people who have multiple homes

      • nomy@lemmy.zipEnglish
        11·
        2 days ago

        I’d even be willing to let someone have their lake/hunting cabin/whatever and not tax too much but people are greedy and we’re far past that point. Once you start accumulating 5-10 homes, taking them off the market for other buyers, the taxes should increase exponentially.

      • IttihadChe@lemmy.mlEnglish
        3·
        2 days ago

        We cAn tax them 1 home for every excess home and donate that home to a homeless person

      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyzEnglish
        2·
        2 days ago

        The Welsh did that (or just some Welsh councils?), pretty sure it was very popular among the people actually living in the area.

      • chunes@lemmy.world
        1·
        2 days ago

        I’m not super fond of dynamic typing either. I like untyped or uni-typed languages like ‘everything is an array’ (APL) or ‘everything is an integer’ (Forth, assembly).

        I’m of the same opinion as Chuck Moore who once observed, “Strong typing merely creates errors so that they can be detected.” In my experience, the amount of complexity added by these systems is staggering. To such a degree that they cause more errors than they prevent. More types, more opportunities to use them incorrectly, after all.

        I also prefer the ‘build the program while it’s running’ workflow, which is inhibited by static typing.

        • jsomae@lemmy.ml
          3·
          1 day ago

          One time I found a C++ library where everything was of a single type, the “untype” essentially. It removed all type safety, in other words, to allow pure binary access to all data. I mean, there’s an occasion now and then when one needs that sort of thing, but I found in every case it was just a headache. Now I know there’s two people like that, haha.

          Well, I don’t agree with you, but I respect a hot take about coding when I see one. My own a-little-less-spicy-than-yours take is that OOP is overated.