Now this ought to have been taken with my 100mm Macro Lens, but all I had was Canon R5 Mk II + RF200mm-800mm lens, with a minimum focal distance of 0.8m at 200mm.

But I get the terrible feeling it was better done with the telephoto lens !?!

Anyway, what might be a female “Beautiful Demoiselle” (but could be some other sort of Damselfly), nowhere near water.

  • KevinFRK@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yes, depth of focus is greater, removing one issue of macro photography (at least, unless you’ve the hang of focus stacking and the post-processing required).

    • CameronDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I meant physically squish it, I tried to take a photo of a praying mantis with a 22mm lens, was so fixated on getting close enough I nearly crushed the poor thing. Fortunately the lens hood hit the wall first.

      • KevinFRK@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Mmm, lens hoods are vital lens protectors - I’m not sure mine have ever usefully stopped glare, but protecting from knocks - invaluable!