As I understand it, birth defects are like 99.999% of the time unhelpful. But that 0.0001% of the time the genetic freak is a huge advantage and that gets passed down in the gene pool and thus, over many many generations, evolution.

Alcohol, which is known to increase birth defects, should increase the speed at which that happens. Right? Like playing the lottery with more tickets.

  • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I have a hard time believing that not having enough sex was ever the reason that prehistoric people had too few children.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Oh they HAD enough children. The majority just died early. Disease, fire, cliffs, dinosaurs eating them. It was rough.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        13 hours ago

        The only “dinosaurs” that were around at the same time anything vaguely human was, was chickens and such other theropod descendants.

        We, uh, ate them.