i wonder what y’all have to say about this

  • HalfSalesman@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    How do you reach that conclusion? We’re all just bits of matter, assembled in various shapes and configurations.

    Because… inert matter doesn’t make decisions…

    How are you evaluating happiness absent existence? Hell, how are you evaluating happiness, period?

    As long as you accept the premise that some people are happy and some people are unhappy, I don’t think measuring it for precision matters.

    Are you arguing a given child would be better off inert? Are blindness, deafness, and paralysis virtues?

    They wouldn’t be a child if they were never born to begin with.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Because… inert matter doesn’t make decisions…

      Why is that good?

      As long as you accept the premise that some people are happy and some people are unhappy, I don’t think measuring it for precision matters.

      The claim is that people who experience unhappiness shouldn’t exist. Why would I accept a precisionless “unhappy” on these terms?

      They wouldn’t be a child if they were never born to begin with.

      They would still exist as something. Children don’t appear ex nihilio.

      Your argument isn’t for non-existence. It is for non-sentience.