This question is social/political, and meant to trigger a nice debate on the negatives of imbalanced infinite progressivism we seem to be heading in social and technological spheres, ignoring science, practicality and reason.

Let me put up a disclaimer that I am not trying to poke transgender community here. I am trying to hint towards the “traditional” gender roles that seem to be frowned upon in a cultist manner, even though it is accepted in an unspoken manner that most of us do prefer a lot of “traditional” aspects once we surpass 30s, and life demands responsibility, accountability and maturity.

8values made me think of the fundamental parameters that we gauge ourselves and others on, and this seems like it would have opinions coming from leftists that frown upon traditional values in an almost religious manner, as well as centrists and conservatives that might not have as traditional views as leftists think. Just an open discussion.

We can replace “progressivism” with “liberty” and “nationalism” and create couple more questions, but those are not as debatable I think.

  • NovaPrime@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    It does not help that NATO loves weaponising trans people for neoliberal white power agenda.

    Expand and explain further please.

    …we are getting closer…

    And therein lies the problem with your post imo. You decry the supplantation of “traditional” values but fail to acknowledge the reason for it is because the systems they’re built on are inherently oppressive, unjust, and built for the benefit of the few. “Getting closer” to accepting someone for the characteristics they exhibit that in no way impact others is not good enough. The systems that insist on slow rolling out human rights in order to preserve the comfort and avoid cognitive dissonance of “traditionalists” deserve to be torn down to the root

    • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      It does not help that NATO loves weaponising trans people for neoliberal white power agenda.

      Expand and explain further please.

      My description of the current “order” is cis normative western superimperialist surveillance capitalist media-military complex. If you looked at the history of, or how there is overwhelming presence of white people in police, military and capitalist positions in western countries, or how there is a “blue eyes blonde hair” preference among Europeans openly called for by the big Western media outlets during Ukrainian refugee escape (non-whites were stopped and beaten on Poland border), you can see it far more openly than your assumption of me not seeing things that seem obvious to you.

      The goal of western superimperialist capitalist order has always been to consider whites at the top. The funding and encouragement for Muslim genocide in Palestine is a clear example. Muslim journalists were quickly ousted since October, and Arab resolution for ceasefire was vetoed by USA. You have African-Americans who got assimilated into western capitalism and today cheer for it and shit on Africans and Muslims as per convenience and for appeasing their white “masters”. English fascism never died with Hitler’s regime, it existed before and after it and still does. Uyghur genocide propaganda was fake western concern for Muslims, when China was protecting them from radicalisation.

      The systems that insist on slow rolling out human rights in order to preserve

      I think the “system” is already tearing apart, both itself and via social opposition. Capitalism is unsustainable, and that is the backbone of western imperialism with social discriminatory values embedded within it. USA’s skin colour based social order was inspiration for Hitler to enact racial segregation policies in Germany.

      • HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’m not hearing how trans people fit into this. You know the Nazis killed a lot of trans people and the book burnings included the research of the time, right?

        • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          A lot of trans people and feminists are utilised to push Washington Consensus neoliberal agenda. It is not exclusively trans people. There are videos by CIA themselves on YouTube showing how they “celebrate” (assimilate) POCs and women.

          • HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            9 months ago

            Unpack this, please? What is that agenda? How are trans people and feminists being used to push it? What does skin deep “support” in the form of lip service have to do with it?

            • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              I have no need to unpack the obvious here. This is more obvious than anything “obvious” I have been told I should know.

              • HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                It isn’t obvious to me, and I know a lot of queer people and feminists (there’s a lot of overlap, since queer people, as societal outcasts, can see matters from the outside in a way people plugged into social reality can’t).

          • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            I guessed TikTok, but of course, it’s good ol’ YouTube. I hate to break it to you, but I think those videos were Kentucky Fried Bullshit.

            But of course, what do I know? I’m sure there are loads of CIA agents on YouTube revealing the master trans plan to a select few who happen to like and subscribe. 🙄