And if I’m wrong and everyone is actually doing it, how is it sustainable in the long run? I mean, we can’t all be millionaires.

  • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    A large number of us CAN be millionaires. Which is a problem.

    It took me roughly 40 years to become a millionaire. 40 years of investing in stable stocks and bonds and scrimping and living well below my means. I was finally able to afford to buy a house. Then the market boomed and suddenly I’m worth over a million.

    Unfortunately, almost all of that is tied up in owning a small plot of land. If I sold it, I’d need to immediately use it to buy another small plot of land, or leave my city or go back to extortionate rent. And yet I need to pay monthly taxes on that land, or I no longer own it.

    Where I used to spend $90/month on food, now I spend well over $500/month.

    Essentially, if you’re over 55 and you’re not a millionaire and you’re living in a major city, you’re screwed because of inflation.

    • rational_lib@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      A large number of us CAN be millionaires.

      It’s actually technically correct that we all can be millionaires, at least on a household basis. The mean household wealth in the US was $1.06 million as of 2022, by now it’s undoubtedly higher. So with a full redistribution of wealth every household would have over $1 million.

      In reality though the median household wealth is just under $200k as of 2022, and doesn’t rise as consistently so who knows where it is now.

      • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        So half of US households have less than 200k to their name lol

        Ie half the country got nothing in practice.

        200k wont save you from a catastrophic health event. Your family is BKed

      • Nighed@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        3 days ago

        They’re saying that if you’re 55 and in that situation you are in trouble as you’re running out of time to get out of the situation. In your 30s it might not be great compared to previous generations, but you still have time to turn things around.

      • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 days ago

        I think you’re conflating a few things there.

        Most people in North America and Europe under 30 today are likely to become millionaires before they die. My point was that being a millionaire is pretty much useless when you spend that much in groceries and rent in a year.

        Over 55s had a dream of becoming millionaires when they were younger and a million dollars was enough to live on for the rest of your life. The sad truth is that those who didn’t make it are likely to die in poverty, while most of those who did make it likely still can’t afford to retire at 65.

        The younger you are, the more the S&P will help you compound your savings to the point where you can afford to stop working before you die. Assuming you can save anything—which is really difficult and getting harder.

        • trolololol@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          You’re right, I’m conflating Boomer with being born in a wealthy country for starters. Which most people don’t.