I feel like Rat tested me too. Sigh.

  • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    I think this is one of the first generations where kids, in general, listen to softer pop music compared to their parents.

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        I always was about the money. Nirvana even named one of their songs Radio Friendly Unit Shifter.

        If all the kids wanted to listen to death metal, there would be death metal on the radio.

        • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          It has always been about money for the labels, but they at least used to take risks, and find new talented bands, develop them, and promote them. But it’s riskier and takes a lot more work. An artist needs a minimum of about 10,000 hours of experience before they’re studio ready, and the whole band needs to be at that level. If they find someone new and unique at that level, they still need to develop them as performers, and get them prepared to play big gigs, tour, work together in a studio, etc… It’s much easier for them to find someone attractive who knows some dance moves, and have them perform studio written songs based on proven profitable beats.

          • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            It’s much easier for them to find someone attractive who knows some dance moves,

            You are describing The Sex Pistols. But they were harder than the music their parents listened to. (In the 1970’s, the parents would have listened to 1940’s music.)