• Chozo@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 months ago

    If I had to guess, I’d say funding and plausible deniability are the big reasons. The longer the war wages on, the longer the US and other allies keep sending them money and weapons. And killing them off slowly makes it easier to argue to the ICC that you weren’t trying to commit genocide, it just kinda happened as an oh-so-unfortunate side-effect of defending themselves.

    • crashfrog@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      What “plausible deniability”?

      If they spent two hours killing everyone in Gaza, it’d be over before anyone could do anything about it. And then what? Nobody’s going to war with a nuclear power in revenge for Gazans. Bibi just stops visiting Brooklyn and nothing happens.

      But they don’t do that. The Jews of Israel bleed and die to save the lives of Gazans who hate them. I wouldn’t, but they do.

      • Mrkawfee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        It took the Germans a while to liquidate the Warsaw Ghetto. The Zionists have killed 200,000 so far (according to the Lancet) and rendered all of Gaza uninhabitable.

        • crashfrog@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          It took the Germans a while to liquidate the Warsaw Ghetto.

          Only because they used starvation instead of air power. Israel sends 3500 calories to Gaza per Gazan per day; that’s more food per day than a person eats in Luxembourg.

          The Zionists have killed 200,000 so far (according to the Lancet)

          You surely mean “according to a letter someone sent to the Lancet, using a methodology that counts currently-living persons as “fatalities.”