Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agoMaybe this is better for everyonelocklemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square448linkfedilinkarrow-up1591
arrow-up1591external-linkMaybe this is better for everyonelocklemmy.worldRoflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square448linkfedilink
minus-squaremathemachristian[he]@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up10·1 year agoThe rhetorically impressive and easily debunked argument: A) Slavery of sentient beings is wrong B) Animals are sentient ∴ Enslaving animals is wrong
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned from communitylinkfedilinkarrow-up13·1 year agoi used a plural. it’s not just one argument. you’re not being very honest about the breadth of the arguments made.
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned from communitylinkfedilinkarrow-up11·1 year agoanimal agriculture isn’t slavery. i don’t believe even vegans believe this syllogism rings true. if they did, we’d have a lot more harriet tubmans and a lot fewer tash petersons.
The rhetorically impressive and easily debunked argument:
A) Slavery of sentient beings is wrong
B) Animals are sentient
∴ Enslaving animals is wrong
i used a plural. it’s not just one argument. you’re not being very honest about the breadth of the arguments made.
animal agriculture isn’t slavery. i don’t believe even vegans believe this syllogism rings true. if they did, we’d have a lot more harriet tubmans and a lot fewer tash petersons.