So my company decided to migrate office suite and email etc to Microsoft365. Whatever. But for 2FA login they decided to disable the option to choose “any authenticator” and force Microsoft Authenticator on the (private) phones of both employees and volunteers. Is there any valid reason why they would do this, like it’s demonstrably safer? Or is this a battle I can pick to shield myself a little from MS?

  • neidu2@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Can you claim that you don’t have a smartphone? Then they’d either have to provide an alternative authentication method, or provide you with a phone.

    I’ve been part of the Microsoft Bad crowd for well over 25 years now, but there are a few things that I will concede that MS has done well. Authenticator is one of them. I haven’t looked much into the privacy aspect of it, though.

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      6 months ago

      Strong disagree with Microsoft Authenticator being well done - anything that is needlessly incompatible with competitors is bullshit. Either make your authenticator use the standard or fuck off.

      • föderal umdrehen@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 months ago

        Push Authentication in the MS Authenticator is Microsoft’s proprietary thing. And I think that’s probably what we’re talking about here.

      • atocci@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        Might be interpreting your comment wrong, but it is compatible with competitors. You don’t need to use Authenticator as your 2FA for a personal Microsoft account, and you can use Authenticator in place of any other TOTP app. It’s OP’s IT department that have chosen to disable the option to use other apps.

    • BobGnarley@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      6 months ago

      If it has Microsoft’s name on it, the privacy implications are horrendous. Guaranteed.

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 months ago

      Don’t do that. Just say they will provide you with an authenticator paid for by them.

    • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Except that the Authenticator is being forced in place of other, third party apps.

      I don’t mind using my phone to authenticate. But now I’m not allowed to do it from Bitwarden. I must use their app.

      • englislanguage@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Are you forced to use their app or are they just very insistently trying to trick you into using it? I.e., have you tried with Bitwarden or any other TOTP capable app?

        • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          I’m using a non-Google authenticator even though Google hit me with an “install Google Authenticator” dark pattern. Was kinda surprised it worked. Then I was miffed.