• 2ndDegreeOWO@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Sure. 25% --> 37% … as long as you (for some arbitrary reason) only consider 8 “places” in the solar system.

    7 of those are planets, but Titan is a moon. If we’re going to include moons, then there’s going to be a whole lot more than 8 “places” in the solar system, so the percentage of places where helicopters can work is going to be greatly reduced. If we get really pedantic and consider any orbiting body in the solar system to be a “place”, then there will be hundreds, thousands of them where helicopters can’t possibly work, once you start tallying up asteroids and comets.

    Also, why does the list include 7 planets, not 8? What? Are you not interested in trying to make a helicopter work on Mercury? That’s quitter talk!

    • usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Places where helicopters can work is places with sufficient atmosphere, which is why the list is what it is

    • testfactor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I think it’s saying those are the eight places a helicopter could work, and we are checking them off as we accomplish them.

      Helicopters require atmosphere (obviously), so this is a list of the eight bodies in the solar system with atmosphere sufficient for heavier-than-air flight.

      Mercury basically doesn’t have an atmosphere for instance, which is probably why it’s not on the list.

    • Sarah Valentine@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The list is only of “places where helicopter would work”. The checkmarks are the ones we’ve sent helicopters to.

  • marcos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    That’s 50% of those places that we also know how to land on, soon to be 75%.

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Depends on how deep you go. I’m surprised none of the proposed missions that I can find are considering staying higher up where it’s not hot and crushing and have an extended mission. They’re mostly orbiting and then DAVINCI which will fall to the surface transmitting data as long as it can. Why not use the middle area? Eh, they know far more than me.