• marcos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    7 months ago

    All the noise I see is from people insisting that Rust developers are noisy, and their favorite language is much better types-don’t-solve-bugs-undefined-behavior-is-fine-and-memory-errors-are-not-a-problem.

    Actual Rust developers have been silent for years.

    • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      7 months ago

      I once shared that I had a bad first experience with Rust and no less than four Rust developers arrived to inform me that I was either hallucinating, or bad at programming, or both.

      I haven’t had this much fun winding up a sensitive community since I shared how I really felt about Java Spring, in it’s heyday.

      • pooberbee (they/she)@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        7 months ago

        I suspect there are a lot of “Rust devs” that are little more than kool-aid drinkers. Common refrains are that Rust is the fastest language, most type-safe language, and most powerful language. Rust certainly seems to move the state of the art forward in some ways, but you can still write garbage code in it.

        I’ve worked with lots of different people in lots of different languages, and I think I’d rather good people in a bad language than the other way around by a mile.

      • veroxii@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        7 months ago

        Bloody hell mate. A little bit of warning before so casually dropping Java Spring out there.

    • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      7 months ago

      I tend to stick to interpreted languages so I can’t weigh in on the Rust vs. C++ debate, but I know that if you’re trying to make headway against a language as entrenched as C++ is you’ve got to get loud.