That makes no sense.

You can create a Lemmy or Mastodon account in moments with nothing more than a web browser.

Is that the entire fediverse, no.

Is Facebook one thing, also no.

Your restrictions on excluding the fediverse are nonsensical.

Well, unless it came back in the last 25 minutes, it’s working fine in Western Australia.

Yup.

None of the above.

ARABIA POTTERY, Finland. 1960s RUSKA

Absolutely indestructible. Drop it on the tiles, cracks the tiles.

You can have it in any colour, as long as it’s Brown.

Talk to the building owner.

If you get this wrong you’ll likely cause havoc across the whole building.

When I did events, I’d wear two pairs of socks, thin pair against my feet, then thick pair over the top of that.

I’ve also used moulded sole inserts from time to time.

I’ve been washing clothes for many decades and although I was also taught to turn some clothes inside out, I’ve never noticed any difference if I didn’t and these days I’ll often wash with them oriented normally, mainly because that’s how I prefer to hang them in the cupboard or fold them into drawers and turning them when wet or after taking them off the line or out of the drier makes the whole process even more tedious than it already is.

On a positive note, a Dev responded to that post indicating that the behaviour of the platform is being reviewed.

See: https://lemmy.radio/post/10006706

Depends on what your blender is capable of.

In Australia:

https://reebelo.com.au/

Very cool, didn’t know this existed!

For anyone who wants more: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schumann_resonances

If it’s never happened to you, how would you know that it’s happening at all?

Skin cancer is like an iceberg, what’s under the skin is what will kill you. Go and see your doctor.

Between the clickbait, YouTube “enhancements”, exploding AI slop videos and the atrocious search facility, the platform is rapidly becoming completely unusable for finding relevant information when you’re looking for answers.

As an entertainment platform it’s forcing creators to make long form content and making viewers sit through more and more low quality content.

It’s evolving, but I’m pretty sure it’s heading towards extinction, rather than greatness.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1989_Tiananmen_Square_protests_and_massacre

It uses a security feature of Linux called cgroups or control groups to limit access to resources at a kernel level.

It’s used all over the place, including as the basis of Docker.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cgroups

There’s a common but persistent misconception that Docker is like running a virtual machine. This is understandable but incorrect.

A better way to think of it is as a security wrapper around an untrusted process.

If you look at your running processes whilst a container is running, you’ll see the processes inside the container running on your “host” machine - remember, it’s not a host - guest situation.

There is no relationship between the user inside the container, unless you start mapping the UID and GID.

The only exception to this is the root user which shares the UID/GID with the actual root user.

See: https://www.howtogeek.com/devops/why-processes-in-docker-containers-shouldnt-run-as-root/

Edit: I suspect, but don’t know for sure, that the root user inside the container is actually the same user as the one running the Docker process, which is typically the root user on the “host”.

1. The Docker container should change the user to an internal one (created by the build stage) and the process should run as that user.
2. The uid and gid can be specified at runtime.

See: https://www.docker.com/blog/understanding-the-docker-user-instruction/