I’ve found it out by chance after watching The Patriot tv show.

There is a company sales man who really give masterful full non-sense and cryptic sale pitches, and I suspect thhese were probably encambulator inspired

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G7Do2tlYLhs

The Development of the Turbo-Encabulator
By J. H. Quick

For a number of years now, work has been proceeding in order to bring perfection to the crudely conceived idea of a machine that would not only supply inverse reactive current for use in unilateral phase detractors, but would also be capable of automatically synchronizing cardinal grammeters. Such a machine is the „Turbo-Encabulator.“ Basically, the only new principle involved is that instead of power being generated by the relative motion of conductors and fluxes, it is produced by the modial interaction of magneto-reluctance and capacitive directance. The original machine has a base-plate of prefabulated amulite, surmounted by a malleable logarithmic casing in such a way that the two spurving bearings were in a direct line with the pentametric fan. The latter consisted simply of six hydrocoptic marzelvanes, so fitted to the ambifacient lunar waneshaft that side fumbling was effectively prevented. The main winding was of the normal lotus-o-delta type placed in panendermic semiboloid slots in the stator, every seventh conductor being connected by anon-reversible tremie pipe to the differential girdlespring on the „up“ end of the grammeters. Forty-one manestically spaced grouting brushes were arranged to feed into the rotor slip-stream a mixture of high S-value phenylhydrobenzamine and five percent reminative tetryliodohexamine. Both of these liquids have specific pericosities given by P=2.5C n 6.7 where n is the diathetical evolute of retrograde temperature phase disposition and C is Cholmondeley’s annular grillage coefficient. Initially, n was measured with the aid of a matapolar refractive pilfrometer (for a description of this ingenious instrument, see L.E. Rumpelverstein in „Zeitschrift für Elektrotechnistatischs-Donnerblitze,“ vol vii), but up to the present date nothing has been found to equal the transcendental hopper dadoscope. (See „Proceedings of the Peruvian Academy of Skatological Sciences,“ June, 1914). Electrical engineers will appreciate the difficulty of nubing together a regurgitative purwell and a supramitive wennelsprocket. Indeed, this proved to be a stumbling block to further development until, in 1942, it was found that the use of anhydrous nangling pins enabled a kryptonastic boiling shim to be tankered. The early attempts to construct a sufficiently robust spiral decommutator failed largely because of a lack of appreciation of the large quasi-piestic stresses in the gremlin studs; the latter were specially designed to hold the roffit bars to the spamshaft. When, however, it was discovered that wending could be prevented by a simple addition to the living sockets, almost perfect running was secured. The operating point is maintained as near as possible to the h.f. rem peak by constantly fromaging the bitumogenous spandrels. This is a distinct advance on the standard nivelsheave in that no dramcock oil is required after the phase detractors have remissed. Undoubtedly, the turbo-encabulator has now reached a very high level of technical development. It has been successfully used for operating nofer trunnions. In addition, whenever a barescent skor motion is required, it may be employed in conjunction with a drawn reciprocating dingle arm to reduce sinusoidal depleneration.

˙uᴉɐʇᴉɹq ʇɐǝɹפ uᴉ ɹǝǝɹɐɔ ʇuǝuᴉɯǝ uɐ ǝʌɐɥ puɐ sɹǝǝuᴉƃuƎ lɐɔᴉɹʇɔǝlƎ ɟo ǝʇnʇᴉʇsuI ǝɥʇ uᴉ ʍollǝɟ ɐ ǝɯoɔǝq oʇ uo ʇuǝʍ ʞɔᴉnQ ˙ɹW ˙uǝɥʇ ǝɔuᴉs sǝɯᴉʇ ʎuɐɯ ǝlʇʇᴉ˥ ˙p ɹnɥʇɹ∀ ʎq pǝʇuᴉɹdǝɹ uǝǝq sɐɥ puɐ lɐuɹnoſ ʎlɹǝʇɹɐnQ ’sʇuǝpnʇS sɹǝǝuᴉƃuƎ lɐɔᴉɹʇɔǝlƎ ɟo uoᴉʇnʇᴉʇsuI ǝɥʇ ʎq ㄣㄣ6Ɩ uᴉ pǝɥsᴉlqnd sɐʍ ʇI ˙ʇuǝpnʇs ɐ sɐʍ ǝɥ ǝlᴉɥʍ ɟoods sᴉɥʇ ǝʇoɹʍ ʞɔᴉnQ suᴉllǝH uɥoſ

Yeah but It still states “A combination of letters, digits and special charaters”

It should then be spelled as “A combination of letters digits, and one special character”

Humans psyche is a meaning inference recursive engine, semiotically I mean, following Charles Sanders Peirce’s Theory of Signs, it generates meaning and thus needs a story to explain it, or simply to tell itself.

The story doesn’t need to hold sound logic or any objectivity true to reality, it only needs to convey the meaning that it generated so that the mind can believe it more than questioning its validity.

Long story short, humans really likes being told and believing stories, and often they are the ones telling the story right to themselves.

A girl I’ve dated for a while worked as photographer for live events reportage, clocking even thousand shots for event and saving at least a hundred of them for the job, and she told me rather often she was being later contacted by the client, or someone of his entourage, or even some other person from the public, months past the event and asking if she could send them e.g. “that picture where I’m standing with that friend of mine wearing a white shirt…”, and all that of course without even being able to tell her the actual date of the event.

First OS was C64’s Commodore KERNAL/BASIC 2.0 GEOS, if that even counts as an OS, the next was Amiga 500’s AmigaOS

First Linux distro was Fedora

Oh no dude, that wasn’t referred to you at all, I got and enjoyed your lighthearted humour, the comment was a just general consideration on the rhetoric I too often encounter when diving into a heavily controversial threads on the interweb; e.g. usually a rando with 5 figures karma points will suddenly pop up out of nowhere bringing up bro’mbastically that in his own singular experience the argument was true/false, therefore whatever was the hypothesis, or the wall of text of fact-checked peer-reviewed argumentation presented, it surely must be simply correct/wrong…and everyone lived happily ever after in demagogyland.

from the explanation:

This is a famous, centuries-old open question in math known as Goldbach’s conjecture. Mathematicians widely believe that it is true,it has held true for every number checked up to 4 ⋅ 1018, but since it’s impossible to check every number, we can’t assume it’s universally true

Way more than enough to make any thing true on the interweb these days