snowe

These posts showed up right after each other in my feed so I got to see them in order without clicking in 😂

You ask them to add a license, you don’t suggest a license.

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2019/07/fixed-ftc-orders-facebook-stop-using-your-2fa-number-ads

This is my favorite version of this so far.

By not doing a New Year’s resolution. If you’re going to do something, start now, not in the new year. Leaving it to an arbitrary day when “everyone does something” just gives you an out when you don’t succeed. Just go and do it now. There’s literally no point in waiting and honestly a lot of reasons not to wait.

Doggy doggy hole. Doggy doggy hole!

Neither of those will solve the problem in the comic.

Canadians are called american cause they’re in NORTH AMERICA, not cause US has a monopoly on the classification american.

Yes… exactly. dude. you literally just proved my point. India does not have a monopoly on the classification Indian. Holy fuck dude.

Canadians aren’t in america eh? Absolutely no classification we can think of, perhaps a continent or 2 that could describe let’s say a north and south “america” of some sort?

are you purposefully misreading my comments? it’s like you’re trying to read the exact opposite of what I said.

also I gotta edit to add this, I’d love to see where you perceive racism in my comment, just as a readers exercise

you literally said that a group shouldn’t be called what it wants to be because it’s not from a specific region. that’s literally racism. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/racism

Not really. If you’re struggling with it it’s a you problem (and probably partially racism to boot). This isn’t a hard concept. Mexicans are Americans, Canadians are Americans, Peruvians are Americans, even though none of them live in the USA. Just because we (white people) decided to call two locations India doesn’t mean that only one group gets that name. That’s idiotic.

My wife works on reservations. I haven’t heard of any of the tribes she works with being fine with being called Native American. They have their own government organization called the Bureau of Indian Affairs, it seems pretty clear that they prefer that term.

American Indians prefer to be called Indian, not Native American.

That’s just an edible rock.

This is especially funny to me because I tell people all the time about kale being a man made (cultivated) plant from the wild mustard seed.

it’s clear from your comments here and in matrix that you think you’re always right and you clearly can’t take criticism. Good luck in the future dude. You’re going to need it.

removing inappropriate sexual content is completely different than CSAM… a point you seem to be trying INCREDIBLY hard to not understand. Dude, just quit. Please please stop with this nonsense. You are unable to let it go. Every one of us builds bad software at some point. For you this is it. Just let it go, go build something else.

Sheesh.

…. That’s not what CSAM is. It’s literally in the name. abuse. CSAM requires abuse of a child. Just like pictures of your kids in the bath isn’t illegal, AI generated content is going to need to be provably linked to abuse in order to meet the definition. I seriously doubt it ever will be. You seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding of the entire situation, overreacted so much so that you might have gotten people in serious legal trouble, and are now trying to justify it because you think that the current solutions aren’t going to protect against CSAM.

I literally linked a software that does what yours does, but is already used, already proven to work, and also has the benefit of being the backup to the hash based mechanism instead of being the primary mode of filtering.

Dude, I was trying to be nice how I approached you earlier, but you clearly are unwilling to accept that you have made a massive mistake here, not only by not reading up on the laws, but not even fundamentally understanding the problem space. This is not good software engineering.

The situation Has dramatically changed in the the past year. I am telling you but you seem to be in denial.

What situation? You haven’t told me anything about anything changing in the last year.

Likewise currently you’re unprotected. As such my previous statement applies: good luck!

Huh? What previous statement? You’re not protected. You just think you are! You literally claimed that your product has lots of false positives. It most definitely has false negatives too.

They have been used on millions of websites already. It’s pretty clear that it works. It doesn’t need to be used on lemmy to prove it works. And my application is currently in review so no I haven’t used it. But that really doesn’t matter. Especially if you’re comparing it to a tool written by one person that has been out for a few days.

I don’t know why you say that like it’s not already successful.