His source is he made it up and “just trust me”.

hey, Hey, is this you?

Did you get kicked off of reddit and so you decided to make up your own little Lemmy instance to rule over? Is that what happened here?

If this isn’t you, it sounds EXACTLY like you. Food for thought. You write and sound exactly like this person… Take that information, do some self reflection, stop watching Rick and Morty, grow as a person.

blahblahblah, you’re committing acts of attentional violence on me. Can you remove yourself from this instance?

Causing straight up emotional and psychic damage to everyone around you through the sheer power of cringe… this is literally you… this is what everyone sees you as.

fr. Dude loves to hear themselves talk so much, they’re probably a narcissist too.

this mf quoted their own opinion article they wrote as though it was a source.

You wrote a “Made for Tumblr” revisionist deconstruction of a thousands of years old myth, published it on Medium, and then referenced as proof/source here…

Holyhell, that’s levels of up one’s own ass never seen before.

I cut off my father after him defending the murder of George Floyd by reciting TimPool/Peterson talking points. And then he died last year. So, I guess he’d have to fix that first.

im 14 an this is very deep.

are you lost?

The whinier you are about being downvoted, the more I think you deserve it.

I would argue that his massive history and modlogs of him being a shitty person with inflammatory comments and toxic takes are why he deserves it. It should be obvious that after two years of mod corrective actions for egregious behavior he’s not going to change.

Him doing the “oh, woe is me” act here feels pretty hollow.

Its giving, THE_PACK

There were a few pedo defenders in that thread (see the other user that got fully banned for doubling down over and over again). I tagged the profiles making excuses for pedos which is why I knew who OP was (roughly).

Just kinda feel like people who try to equate pedophiles as part of the queer community are probably shitty people. And probably have shitty takes… and looks like they have a lot of shitty takes. So much that theyre whining about getting downvoted.

I mean, Jesus, just look at their modlog… banned for pedo apologia, actual antisemitism, civility, etc etc etc. Pages of mod actions…

Is it because of that time you were defending pedophilia and regurgitating MAP talking points?

EDIT: or maybe it’s the constant repulsive content that has resulted in pages, and pages, and pages of mod actions for years? For things such as: racism, transphobia, actual antisemitism, advocating violence, racism again, and look…

pedophile apologia again…

Man… I wonder why people would downvote you… it’s a a real headscratcher.

Ok.

Wow, the couple of comments so far are just raging “le redditor atheist”.

This comic is harmless. Ya’ll just see “religion” and get angry… calm down edgelords.

Holy shit… the return of sexylosers isnt something I expected.

Sadly he died during covid.

Here’s where you’re wrong

Their litmus test for “people they think will agree with them” is just: be a white man.

I am a burly white dude. Tall, big beard, I look like I walked out of the mountains… Unprompted, some white people will casually say some unhinged rascist shit to me. And have, many times.

One time there was a shooting nearby, a white maintenence worker told me about it, and then without missing a beat goes “it was two black guys shooting at eachother, so much for brotherly love, right?”

Another time, in a gas station up in the sticks, Im buying a can of monster. Some white stranger, unprompted, taps me on the shoulder starts telling me about how the logo is a Jewish letters for the sign of the devil…

So, no, you dont have to be someone these people know… you just have to a white man. They assume any white man (especially masculine presenting) is one of them.

The visual flow for dialog is bad. Especially on panel 3. The way the eyes move from panel 2 to 3 has you read the dialog from orange on panel 2 directly to the orange dialog on panel 3. Especially since orange’s dialog is higher in the panel.

Convention is to read the highest text first. So it reads as though orange is just unprompted berating green, to which then green is responding to that (that the berating is unfair, not that the race was unfair). When you realize that’s the wrong order, and you’re supposed to read the lower text first, then it makes sense that green is stating the fault initially and then orange is attacking green for that.