

That’s the sort of thing that starts talking to the protagonist in a dark-comedy/horror movie that takes a turn for the existential and depressing near the end.
… basically, whatever you name it or it names itself, DO NOT TAKE ITS ADVICE
History Major. Cripple. Vaguely Left-Wing. In pain and constantly irritable.


That’s the sort of thing that starts talking to the protagonist in a dark-comedy/horror movie that takes a turn for the existential and depressing near the end.
… basically, whatever you name it or it names itself, DO NOT TAKE ITS ADVICE


Tbf it does say perceived speed. Perception is shaped by marketing and bells and whistles regardless of reality, and all that jazz.
There’s no fucking way, that can’t be tr-


uwu


For the same reason Chaos and Wholesome are opposites
for the shitpost o7


“Talk is a national institution, but it does not help the slave!”


Get fucked. When someone asks you to disengage, disengage. You’re being an asshole.
I’m sorry I don’t follow the rules of the Fae, or whichever arcane code you’re following?
If you want to disengage, feel free to disengage. No one is forcing you to respond to me. If you want to get the last word in and then say “Disengage” thinking it’s a “Now my points can’t be responded to :3” card, feel free to go fuck yourself.


The people have armed themselves to protect themselves from people like you.
The People’s Stick, I see.
They are more free than you can possibly imagine, and that idea terrifies you.
Maybe the post-1950s PR campaign was unnecessary all along.


They’ve literally hosted international conferences this year.
tightly restricted entry to and interaction with their territory from outsiders, with journalists only allowed to ask questions when accompanied by EZLN guards?
You wanna point out to me where that contradicts “holding a conference”?
I literally cannot with you people.
Yeah, sorry that you haven’t been following anything except the endless glazing of Subcommandante Marcos. I understand that PR of the internet age is much more compelling to our generation than the staid 1950s-level PR of former ML states, but I would suggest that you learn to think for yourself nonetheless.
Please disengage, I’m sick of the bad faith bullshit.
“Bad faith is when I’m contradicted”
Okay.


Do you have any actual objections to life under the Zapatistas, or are you just going to continue vagueposting about how it must be bad because you decided it must be?
You do realize that the Zapatistas, before this recent trouble with “Blaming the government (that they don’t need) for not controlling the cartels” tightly restricted entry to and interaction with their territory from outsiders, with journalists only allowed to ask questions when accompanied by EZLN guards?
There’s a long laundry-list of problems with how the Zapatistas have ‘settled in’ to their role since the turn of the century.
You in big poodoo now.


Ah, I’ll be uncreative and say Picard!


Why would a person want to be trusted to not do drugs?
Remind me never to have you make any deliveries for me.


At what temperature does a normal body boil


Switching hard 😔


Americans using the word propaganda for “something I don’t understand because my school system failed me so now I overcompensate by making up factoids that make me look even more uneducated by the rest of the world”
Whoosh.


-40% hot, that’s pretty damn cold!
Overall, you’re right, but I’d like to point out two caveats here:
Southern plantation farming was incredibly inefficient and utterly ruined the land it was practiced on - something that was recognized (and criticized) as early as George Washington. So they did build their plantations in fertile areas, but exhausted the soil and did very little to let it recover until George Washington Carver (unrelated) started spreading crop rotations around ~1900.
The aristocrats made a shitton of money relative to the average person, but they were much, much poorer - both individually and as a society - than the industrialized North. Northern farming, even, was much more efficient - but the Southern aristocracy perpetuated their system because control was more important than money. In the slavery (and sharecropping) system, the plantation class effectively ruled little fiefs of dependent ‘free’ farmers and unfree (legally or practically) Black labor, able to exercise wide-reaching control not just economically, but also socially, culturally, and politically. Given the choice between more luxury or more power, they chose more power, and used that power to perpetuate their sickened systems.