

fair point, but to get there you must go to the comments to begin with, which I believe might be less likely you do when you don’t have something to say.
fair point, but to get there you must go to the comments to begin with, which I believe might be less likely you do when you don’t have something to say.
on the other hand, there is generally not much to discuss if you have an agreeing position. right?
“vertically challenged” hahahah
What did you think we had encyclopedias for?!
I would presume so, yes.
Nuclear bombs are extremely stable when not armed. If you blow one up with external explosives it will just break.
wait, does windows jit compile C++ ??
come to the dork side
A usb stick with a live linux iso is generally enough
but it removed half the point…?
i know this is a joke, but i find it quite interesting those two words have completely different etymologies.
Grave as in burial site comes from an old proto indo european word for “dig”, while grave as in serious comes from french.
I mean, sure, you won’t stay alive for very long with a stopped heart.
I meant like, when someones heart stops and gets restarted again with cpr or a defibrillator or something. People often call that being dead, and coming back.
people say quitting smoking is hard. I don’t understand, I do it multiple times a day.
I know this is a definition in many places. I find it stupid and useless.
The heart beating is not a good definition of being alive in my opinion. The heart stopping temporarily doesn’t mean you died, you were just in terribly grave danger.
If a person is defined by their heart, what does that make a heart transplant?
utterly useless definition.
oh god the reason is even stupider then I expected
Because large numbers use the
e
character in their string representation (e.g.,6.022e23
for 6.022 × 1023), usingparseInt
to truncate numbers will produce unexpected results when used on very large or very small numbers.parseInt
should not be used as a substitute forMath.trunc()
.
I liked gnome for its minimalistic UI. I then realized i3 does that better :D
fun fact, the RFC introducing NAT calls it a “short-term solution”
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1631