You really can’t think of anything more obviously a case of treason than what you believe trump has done?

The guy is loyal only to himself, no doubt. But, I don’t even see how it would fit this definition at all, and I can easily come up with many things more obviously a violation. Also keep in mind that Russia is not an enemy; we are not at war with them. They are an adversary.

I mean, isn’t that the definition of a traitor?

The definition of treason is very clear and very narrowly defined in the COTUS, and this does not meet the definition.

I’m not as doomer as everyone else for the short term. It’s the long term I’m worried about. He might get 2 more scotus members, and he’s going to do everything in his power to undercut any attempt to tackle climate change. And that includes his scotus picks who will almost certainly declare any needed attention to address climate change as unconstitutional.

This is a terrible apology. You make it all about then instead of your actions and then don’t even say you won’t do it, but only that you’ll try to do it…and then immediately dropping the f bomb throwing out the window any chance that you’re “trying” means anything.

I read this and was like “10 bucks says it’s just alphabetical” and, lo and behold, it’s just alphabetical. How is that not the obvious answer?

They haven’t even started counting yet.

You need to take a fucking chill pill, my man.

https://www.realclearscience.com/journal_club/2014/07/23/sit_or_stand_how_should_men_pee_108761.html

It only sounds like a contradiction if you take “pro-life” literally. In fact, I find this hard to understand at all if you simply just listen to pro-lifers.

Let me be clear, I’m about as firm a supporter of a woman’s right to choose as they come. I’m also adamantly against the death penalty. Do you find this position to be contradictory?

However, the general position of “pro lifers” does not contradict this at all, pretty obviously. They think that a fetus is a child that hasn’t been born yet, and because it hasn’t been born, it’s completely innocent. So you have no right to take it’s life. However, if some person in life has done something in life that removes that innocence, they believe sometimes that rises to such a heinous level that they must be permanently and irrevocably removed from society.

There are other glaring contradictions in their position, like not wanting to provide support to that innocent baby once it has come into the world, but this is clearly not one of them.

I think this has long since debunked and it’s actually the other way. At the very least it’s inconclusive.

The idea of it being girlie to sit down and pee far predates the “domestication” of boys. Additionally, the idea that “if you are a man you have to sit down to pee” is what is attempting to force some kind of social conformity. . . “pee how you like, it has nothing to do with how manly you are” is exactly the opposite.

“doing real labor” “easy, sweatless, office job” “the actual wheel turners”

“I dislike the condescending attitude”

It never ceases to amaze me how often people see and hate shit in other people that they epitomize themselves.

And honestly, my experience has been the opposite and I see the condescending attitude, at least more openly, coming from blue collar workers more often.

Whether you’re trolling or if this is real, you need help.

Since for me I actually am a kemonomimi.

No, you’re not. That’s the whole point.

I am really curious why being a kemonomimi is a mental illness.

Because you’re not kemonomimi, you’re a human, they are fictional. If you were just dressing up as one for fun, or it was a kink, that would be one thing.

But this appears to be much more, you believe you are one and/or are trying to live your life as one. This is not healthy.

You seem to recognize, in the post and some of your replies, that this is the result of trauma. It’s not some healthy part of who you are, it’s an unhealthy trauma response.

I don’t think there is anything inherently wrong with what you’re doing, but the reason why people don’t take to it well is because you’re exhibiting a mental illness.

You need psychological help more than you need to worry about people accepting this.

Lol what the fuck? Why on earth would anyone get a license if there were no punishment for not having one? Also I assure you that they didn’t get pulled over for having no license; they were breaking another driving law.

There is a kid on my son’s soccer team (East Coast) who is from Cali. I asked him why his family moved here. Unfased he said some forest fire burned his home down and then when they found a place to live again another forest fire burned it down. I guess is parents were like “fuck this.”

I can’t tell if you are actually this clueless or just disingenuous.

You asked me what I was implying, I told you nothing, then pointed to my explicit point.

It doesn’t. It’s almost like you are wilfully ignorant about thinking critically.

Nothing, I explicitly said “we should be as skeptical of that which supports our beliefs as we are of that which contradicts it.” I don’t know how I could have made it more clear.