I’ve never heard of that, and I’m not sure I believe it. For a few reasons: 1, Pierce Brosnan did lend his likeness to a bunch of PS1 Bond games, 2, if they used a look alike and presented it as Brosnan it would still be Brosnan’s likeness. 3, they probably had his likeness as part of a greater contract whether or not he personally turned up for the production of said games.

Crispin Glover sued when they used prosthetics on an actor to look like him in the back to the future sequel that he wasn’t hired for. Just because they don’t use your face doesn’t mean it’s not unauthorised use of your likeness.

In one or more of the Buffy games, Sarah Michelle Gellar didn’t turn up to help make the game but she still would’ve received royalties for her likeness.

The number itself won’t matter, but you’ll see it increment in real time if they lie

I think the problem with BMI is when people misunderstand what it’s for. Is not an “am I fat” tool. It’s specifically about heart health and it’s not used in isolation. The more mass you have (fat or muscle) the more your heart has to work. It’s naive to ignore it just because the word “obese” has become an offensive term.

I always thought it was a dumb plot point, but obviously it’s whatever “half” definition however Thanos thought of it. So probably just half of sentient creatures, or something. The point is, the answer is whatever Thanos wanted.

2 solid spin offs, and a small handful of extended universe content as well

That’s only if you only consider the 3 main characters. They each have relationships with recurring characters.

When Carson came back they clearly establish he is a clone.

As Dr Karl says: gambling is a tax for being bad at math

You must be deliberately ignoring things at this point.

Have you never seen a science fiction time travel film where a person occupies the same timeline more than once? You’ve not seen Back to the Future? Or Doctor Who? Or more then half of any TV show or movie about time travel?

Also, travelling really fast to time travel, while not grounded in reality, is actually based off the theory of relativity and time dilation. It was also the premise of the Planet of the Apes films.

In this comic, they are suggesting that Superman going really fast will impart a physical force onto the planet Earth, like grabbing a spinning basketball and making it spin in the opposite direction. The affect shown here is that the objects on the surface of the planet will experience being thrown around.

This is based on a misinterpretation of what happens in the 1978 feature film Superman, starring Christopher Reeves. In the final act of this film Lex Luther presents two simultaneous threats for Superman to react to: a missile launched to kill many people, and Lois Lane in mortal danger. As the viewer we are expecting to watch him choose one over the other. He stops the missile, Lois Lane dies. Stricken by grief he comes up with a plan to travel back in time, presumably by travelling faster than light. Having travelled back to before Lois died there is now two Supermans: past Superman who is currently dealing with the missile, and now future Superman who goes and saves Lois. At a certain point past Superman travels back in time and there are no longer two Supermans.

So, it turns out that the author of the comic is the moron and relies on falsehoods for their punchline to be valid.

Buddy, listen to what people are trying to tell you. The Earth doesn’t change direction, time changes direction. We are watching the earth “re-winding”. Superman individually goes back in time and we see from his perspective time going backwards. He doesn’t impart forces on the planet to turn it backwards on it’s revolution.

He did it because he has to choose between stopping the missile or saving Lois. Going back in time means there’s 2 Supermans for a short period of time so he can do both.

Technically recording TV on VHS is piracy, but in practice no one is getting sued for it.

Mine works when the internet is down. Why doesn’t yours?

I think you’ve really misunderstood bow ties.

So, it sounds like it doesn’t offer a remote streaming service like Plex then. You just publicly expose or use a VPN like you can with Plex.

You can get around this by extending your network with a VPN. I know that’s an extra config, but a lot of people who are setting up home labs are already doing this anyway.

How does jellyfin offer remote streaming without a VPN?

Reads to me like they are the “American ears” they are referring to, as if their world view is the default rather than the bias of an individual.

I feel like I’m witnessing a cliche here; an American discovering that other countries exist. Wait until they realise America isn’t the centre of the universe.

Like, send bison to kill the cows? Or the cows will go live with the bison? If the answer is bison, in not sure what the question is.

Is it 24 hours for each install? Or 24 hours to enable the ability to install as many as you like?

Edit, I reread your comment. It’s a one time 24 hour wait to enable the ability.

That sucks but at least they allow it, and I guess you could argue this helps fight against scammers? Sort of?