• 2 Posts
  • 390 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: October 6th, 2023

help-circle




  • I mostly agree. It’s not an efficient way to get to orbit.

    It was an early attempt at reusable launch vehicles, it was a good idea, that turned out to be overcomplicated. The Pegasus 100% worked though, it went to orbit, so it’s not a question of “could it work someday”, it did work, it was just more expensive than the standard methods.

    Again, I’m not saying this is an avenue worth exploring, I’m just saying that it’s incorrect to call it impossible.



  • Cocodapuf@lemmy.worldtoxkcd@lemmy.worldxkcd #3291: Launchpad
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    no they cancelled it because thats impossible lol. you can shoot a satellite with a suborbital object but thats a loooong way from the projectile being orbital.

    Nah, it’s not that long a way. You just need to adjust your goals, add an extra stage, accept a much smaller payload.

    If you can get a payload to space, you could put a payload 1/4 its mass into orbit with an additional stage.

    I mean, the anti-sat F-15 test was pretty wild. But is arguably less wild than other airlaunch systems like the Pegasus or spaceship one. Saying that airlaunch is impossible is silly, because it’s happening.

    These systems get cancelled because they’re expensive and complicated and reusable rockets are cheaper and easier.