

Do not celebrate this. It’s once again an overly broad piece of legislation that can be used for censorship, way beyond its stated purpose
Do not celebrate this. It’s once again an overly broad piece of legislation that can be used for censorship, way beyond its stated purpose
Old people, who predate the Internet, still exist
Reading is hard…
They didn’t explain how parents work, not sure how you can claim that
He’s been buying up huge swathes of farm land in the middle of the country. Not everything he’s doing has been philanthropy
Man who is infamous for saying one thing and doing another, saying he won’t do something… Is not uplifting news.
Especially phrased like this.
According to the article it appears to be a reskinned Chicago. Not sure how much original story is really going to be in it
The pope wouldn’t let him ogle the holy see.
Yeah but think of how many LEDs you could light for 20 seconds once a week if you spent thousands filling your roof with these!
We had these in the US, too. They were called company towns and they were extremely abusive.
Those people who say that are just trying to justify their own hatred/bigotry/war crimes.
This is the inverse of data compression.
You keep acting like votes mean permission to break the law. Our that people who generally don’t pay attention to politics would be fine with someone they didn’t vote for it against breaking the law. This is a dipshit logical stance to take. So pretending you’re not the store one here when you try to say idiotic shit like this. Like did you think this through in your head?
Yes, I keep bringing it up because you boot lickers love to ignore the context of everything you argue about. Abstraction is the only chance you have at winning an argument against such an obviously one sided discussion.
I shouldn’t be surprised by your lack of reading comprehension. I’m not really sure what you’re even responding to, none of it lines up with anything I just said.
And again, telling you he’s going to break the law doesn’t mean he’s allowed to break the law even if he is voted in after saying it.
This is that half of America is functionally illiterate nonsense the rest of us have to deal with.
I would like to move to this location, only show me jobs in this location.
Job board: here’s an email containing only jobs for the location you live in.
Getting voted in is NOT permission to break the law.
He’s illegally bypassing Congress with his actions. Doesn’t matter if this is what your dumbass voted for, it’s not how this works.
Given that he campaigned claiming he wouldn’t be enacting Project 2025 (even though it was obvious he would be), I don’t think you can claim people not voting are automatically okay with him breaking that very explicit promise.
No. Americans do not want this. Americans especially didn’t want it done by some nutjob private citizen who has zero authority to do what he’s doing, and no oversight.
It means he doesn’t have the popular mandate they keep claiming they do.
But yes. Half of adults are functionally illiterate. 5th-6th grade reading levels. They can physically read the words, but will only grasp the most basic surface level meaning. Republicans’ started attacking education decades ago. This is what they wrought.
That’s not the final count
Apparently the entire site copy was just a gpt marketing buzzword vomit with no substance.