Or the one?

I would be curious what Lemmings think the results of a survey would be, if that question were asked in a non-political setting?

  • spunow@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    If they are needs, then none can be compromised.

    A person should always aim for harm reduction. If an unwinnable situation were to arise, harm reduction statistically would favor the many for most scenarios. From a causal perspective, sad as it is to say, the casualties were not going to live past the situation; from this cold but pragmatic perspective, even something as invaluable as a person’s life is unfortunately not “needed” per se.