Don_Dickle@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · 2 months agoIf Trump wins the election thru fraud how can the democrats refute it and prove they won? Or will it just be like another Jan 6 and four years of whining like Trump?message-squaremessage-square113fedilinkarrow-up1247
arrow-up1247message-squareIf Trump wins the election thru fraud how can the democrats refute it and prove they won? Or will it just be like another Jan 6 and four years of whining like Trump?Don_Dickle@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square113fedilink
minus-squareEheran@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoThat’s on the level of “everything could be made up to fool me” or matrix kind of stuff. You can simply be a poll worker yourself.
minus-squaremerc@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoHardly. Historically there has been a lot of cheating in elections. Look at Chicago up to the 1970s. Election fraud was common there. https://www.chicagotribune.com/1973/05/08/how-the-chicago-tribune-exposed-city-vote-fraud-in-1972-and-won-a-pulitzer-prize/ Nobody can prove that there’s less cheating in Chicago elections today than in the 1970s, but people trust that it’s more honest.
That’s on the level of “everything could be made up to fool me” or matrix kind of stuff. You can simply be a poll worker yourself.
Hardly. Historically there has been a lot of cheating in elections. Look at Chicago up to the 1970s. Election fraud was common there.
https://www.chicagotribune.com/1973/05/08/how-the-chicago-tribune-exposed-city-vote-fraud-in-1972-and-won-a-pulitzer-prize/
Nobody can prove that there’s less cheating in Chicago elections today than in the 1970s, but people trust that it’s more honest.