From their site:

Instantly launch your favorite internet appliance with just a click using Cloud Seeder, our open-source server appliance platform for everyone, or use your skills and manually setup a home server lab. With IPv6rs, you will have the external IP you need to self host on your home computer or mobile device.

$10 a month, or $60 for a year, or $80 for 2 years.

Seems they give you an externally routable IP6 address, and then make that route to your home network, where you still have to run the server. They do have an app which is meant to make it easier to install podman containers for whatever service you want to run. For some reason, they call those “appliances”. Not a fan of that word.

Before anyone jumps in to say, “Pffft. I do this now for free” - this isn’t aimed at you then, is it? It’s aimed at making it possible for less technical people to self-host some of their digital life, which is a good thing in general, in my mind. Kind of like how Linux needed more user-friendly distros for the masses to increase adoption. Good on them, I say, and good luck.

  • Toes♀@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 months ago

    It’s fairly straightforward to do for free with Hurricane Electric. Some home routers even have it built in as an option. https://tunnelbroker.net/

    I’m assuming anyone who’s playing around with servers is capable of implementing it.

    • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s very easy to setup a Hurricane Electric tunnel and you get an entire /48 for free. The only downside is that it doesn’t work over CGNAT.

      It looks like IPv6rs is using WireGuard, so it can work even with CGNAT. I didn’t see any mention of what size allocation they hand out though.

    • swissblondy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I tried with HE and you need an external IP before you can use it which makes it completely pointless. I think it’s way easier to do it with ipv6rs.

      • Toes♀@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        That must be a very unfortunate situation where you don’t have control of your network for that to be a concern though. in which case I wouldn’t expect it to be suitable for a internet facing homelab?

        Like I’m struggling to think of scenarios for this.

        I suppose you could be trying to setup a homelab on a college network or using someone else’s internet connection where you have no input on the matter.

        Perhaps, I could see a case for CGNAT like another user mentioned, where the whole town shares an single IP for example. But I’d imagine such a network would offer poor performance.

        But in all those scenarios, a VPS is cheaper and you can do everything this service offers and more.

  • dipak@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    From IPv6.rs FAQs I get the impression that they only provide IPv6 route through their tunnel. I think self-hosting something only reachable via IPv6 would cause you trouble accessing it in IPv4 only networks - which are still far more common compared to IPv6.

    Hurricane Electric provides such IPv6 over IPv4 tunnel facility with /48 block routed to your network. I’ve only used this service for testing my IPv6 knowledge, so performance-wise I’m not sure how good it is. Thus, if IPv6.rs provides a significant performance over the HE-TunnelBroker, then I’d suggest you go with IPv6.rs given a decent price for the service.

    If you are considering a simple to set-up tunnel utility for your self-hosting applications, I’d suggest you consider other tunneling options which have both IPv4 and IPv6 capabilities. Some widely used ones are Cloudflare Tunnel and Ngrok. You may also use Tailscale to connect both server and client via VPN. Using Cloudflare or Ngrok would involve some privacy concerns, as they can see the traffic passing through the tunnels in plain text.

    E: better words substitution

      • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        To best serve our customers during this time, Verizon is rolling out IPv6 address space in a “dual stack” mode – where IPv4 and IPv6 addresses are both loaded.

        Seems like verizon do…

    • Panja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yep my ISP doesn’t offer ipv6, I had to set my own up through Tunnel Broker lol

    • perishthethought@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      I believe it’s helps expose apps running on a home server to the public internet, securely. It allows self hosters to tie internal apps to a domain name. Someone please correct me if I’m wrong.

      • anyhow2503@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        That’s what a firewall and a DNS service is for respectively, imho. As long as you get an IPv6 prefix from your ISP, you can expose as many devices or services to the public as you want, by just allowing incoming traffic to a listening port. That was sort of the whole point of having a large enough address space when moving away from v4. Maybe it’s just me but reading stuff about “private AI” on a website where the relation to the product is not immediately obvious, makes me question their legitimacy.

        The more I look at their site, the more it reads like a sales pitch for IPv6, which sounds kind of expensive at $6-10 a month.

  • 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    $10 per month and all you get is 5 IPv6 addresses (I assume that’s what they mean by “5 Static Visible IPv6 Tunnels”)? What a shameless scam.

    Edit: Though maybe you’re paying for the “Tier-1 (as in ISP?) Bandwidth”. But if they want me to take them seriously, they need to give me a /64 prefix instead of a measly 5 addresses.

    • swissblondy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      If you aren’t behind NAT and know how to handle your own networking you can get free IPs from HE.net. That’s the easiest way.

      I use ipv6rs because in my case it’s cheaper than using a vps since there aren’t any bandwidth caps and I only use 3 IPs (jellyfin and *arr).

  • Decronym@lemmy.decronym.xyzB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I’ve seen in this thread:

    Fewer Letters More Letters
    CGNAT Carrier-Grade NAT
    DNS Domain Name Service/System
    IP Internet Protocol
    NAT Network Address Translation
    VPN Virtual Private Network
    VPS Virtual Private Server (opposed to shared hosting)

    [Thread #734 for this sub, first seen 3rd May 2024, 14:05] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]