he/him

Alts (mostly for modding)

@sga013@lemmy.world

(Earlier also had @sga@lemmy.world for a year before I switched to @sga@lemmings.world, now trying piefed)

  • 2 Posts
  • 53 Comments
Joined 9 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 14th, 2025

help-circle



  • Some people suggest india pak “skirmish”. I am an indian, and it was neither war, and us did nothing.

    I am not going into why skirmish happened, and not taking any sides here (for pakistan or for india), so i do not come out biased.

    We heard “trump did something” 2-3 days after there was a cooldown. And no indian govt official has ever agreed to trumps claims.

    on the other hand (some may claim i am biased against pak gov here, specifically millitary), us has always been interested in pak (they got into afghanistan from pak, they kinda want to do that again).

    I have nothing but love for general pak public, we are same people, mostly are mutually intelligible, and got divided mostly because brits and some “religious” leaders (from both sides) did not like the other side.







  • While I am very happy with this, I would like to add some context for India specifically.

    To put it briefly, our current govt is not climate friendly, and I can say this without further reading, but our forest land has not increased, what has been done is clever redefinition of word forest itself.

    Primarily, what would you consider to be true forest is given to big empires in name of development, and as a “eco tax” money is taken for planting elsewhere (which may have completely different bio-geography).

    secondly, what would you define as sparse, or less dense forest, or just call them grasslands is also being labeled as forests now. this is done by lowering the required amount of trees per unit area in definition. essentially clever accounting.

    Now, if the numbers are by some independent organisation, using satellite data or something, I would trust it and be happy, but if it is aggregating what the nations tell, then I do not trust it.


  • As I understand, It is just a general old people people mindset. Most old folk consider all lgbt stuff to primarily have “dirty” or “impure” thoughts (they essentially look at this not from as an identity part, but more of them being just “pervy”)(this as i understand is the general conservative idealogy - sex is taboo, but having “kids” is natural, you can have both). Not saying this justifies snoop dog’s behaviour. I am not a fan or a hater, just do not know much about them, just explains how could they do that and then this. to them, all lgbt stuff is “not for kids” and completely look over the identity aspect of it.

    His “support” is most likely a simple paid collaboration arranged by their team, and he does not care what it is about.

    Why imo it is still uplifting is because there is some event organised for lgbt folk, and that is always a good in my book. it helps normalise them.